Voluntary Society - Conditioning - Conspiracy

9/11, 9-11, 911 - Government Failure

Downsizer Dispatch

Ignored Warnings

9/11 Fact Sheet

Back-up for http://www.911blogger.com/node/3011

Answers to Frequently Asked Questions:

Q: Terrorists crashing planes into the World Trade Center and Pentagon was wholly unexpected in 2001, wasn't it?

A: No, it was not unexpected http://911proof.com/8.html .

Q: But there is always confusion in any battle situation. Wasn't it the "fog of war" which prevented a successful response to the 9/11 attacks?

A: No. It was the multiple WAR GAMES, including hijack exercises involving real planes, and the injection of fake radar blips onto air traffic controller's screens http://911proof.com/9.html which prevented the good people in the military from stopping the attacks from succeeding against their targets in New York and at the Pentagon.

Q: Wouldn't a huge conspiracy involving thousands of people have been necessary to carry out 9/11, and wouldn't someone have spilled the beans by now if there really was a conspiracy?

A: No. In fact, a small handful of people could have pulled it off. http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/04/911-7-man-job.html

Q: Isn't it crazy to think the government would hurt its own people?

A: No, the U.S. government -- and many other Western governments -- have done so before. Initially, the Joint Chiefs of Staff actually approved a plan to carry out terrorist attacks and kill U.S. citizens and blame it on Cuba, as a justification for invading Cuba. And a government informant has stated that he tried to stop the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, but that the FBI intentionally let the bombing happen. There are many other examples of other governments killing their own people http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/07/foreign-evil.html for political gain, and the U.S. government doing killing its own as well http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/02/false-flags-in-america.html .

As additional examples of the U.S. government letting U.S. citizens die based upon deceptions, many people breathed in highly toxic dust near ground zero, after the government knowingly misrepresented the risk, going as far as discouraging first responders from wearing masks. The U.S. government also misled the American people into the Iraqi war, causing thousands of American deaths.

Q: Isn't 9/11 a partisan political issue, where extremists in one party are simply trying to smear the people in other party for political gain?

A: No, credible people from across the spectrum question 9/11 http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/07/officials-from-across-political.html (Internet Explorer required). See also this website http://patriotsquestion911.com/ .

Q: Let's get back to the government's failure to stopping or intercepting the attacks. If the U.S. government wasn't perfect in stoping the 9/11 attacks, wasn't it due to a series of innocent mistakes or -- at the very worst -- incompetence?

A: Initially, the incompetence argument doesn't really pan out http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/03/incompetence.html , and appearances may be deceiving. And there are many examples of the U.S. faking intelligence http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/12/intelligence-failures.html in order to promote its political goals http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/12/intelligence-failures.html .

Moreover, the government has not acted like it is trying to close vulnerabilities or fix problems which supposedly were unforeseeable before 9/11 http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/05/if-its-broken-why-havent-they-fixed-it.html . Why wouldn't such vulnerabilities be corrected if they were the real cause of 9/11?

And there has been a clear government cover-up of the facts of 9/11 http://911proof.com/6.html . Why would the government work so hard to cover up the true facts of 9/11, going so far as to repeatedly misrepresent the facts and change its story, if incompetence was the only problem with the official story?

And, apparently, fake evidence was planted to implicate certain people for 9/11 http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/11/crooked-cops-and-9-11.html . Why would fake evidence be needed if the offical was true? Do innocent people plant fake evidence?

Q: Doesn't questioning 9/11 distract from much more important issues facing America today?

A: No, it is one of the very most important issues facing our country, and is closely connected with other problems we face http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/05/why-911-is-important.html .

Q: Isn't it clear that Mulsims carried out 9/11, and the war on terror is a clash of civilizations and religions? Therefore, isn't 9/11 skepticism harmful to our faith?

A: Actually, 9/11 truth is a vital issue for all people of faith. That is why prominent Christian theoligians state that 9/11 was an inside job http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/07/prominent-christians-endorse-911-truth.html , and prominent Jewish scholars and rabbis say that uncovering the truth of 9/11 has the power to bring positive, lasting change to our nation and to our world http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1566566606/104-4302294-7530306?v=glance&n=283155 .

Q: Didn't a government agency come clean about their mistaken timeline, solving the whole 9/11 "conspiracy" once and for all?

A: Norad's newest "confession" is just the latest of multiple, completely conflicting versions of what happened on 9/11 http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=2006091418303369 (also listen to this interview http://www.911podcasts.com/files/audio/griffin/griffin-faulkner-8-30-2006.mp3 ).

Moreover, the latest statements by the military simply attempt to scapegoat one government agency, since the previous attempts to blame other agencies made no sense http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/08/scapegoating-norad.html .

Q: Isn't this talk about "demolition" of the Twin Towers just a crazy theory by a couple of nutty people?

A: In fact, a lot of credible eyewitness testimony http://911proof.com/11.html supports this theory, and more and more credible experts http://911proof.com/10.html are discussing this theory every day.

Q: But no one could have planted all of tons of explosives needed to bring down the Twin Towers without people noticing, right?

A: No, that is not true http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/11/how-could-they-plant-bombs-in-world.html .

Q: I've heard claims made by the so-called "9/11 Truth Movement" which have turned out to be false. Doesn't that invalidate the whole 9/11 thing?

A: No, for two reasons. First, there are so many lines of evidence which overwhelmingly prove that 9/11 was an inside job, that even if one or two theories are disproven, the basic thesis still stands.

Moreover, there are some people who are simply sloppy in their thinking, and who throw out unfounded theories which do not stand up to scrutiny. In addition, there are, unfortunately, disruptive people who are working hard to make crazy claims to intentionally discredit the movement. This is a traditional tactic http://www.thefreedictionary.com/straw+man for undermining those who question the government.

"Each man must for himself alone decide what is right and what is wrong, which course is patriotic and which isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide against your conviction is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to yourself and to your country." - Mark Twain

| Home | Conditioning | Conspiracy | 911 | Government Failure |